With Leibniz, I've come to view this as a matter of "pre-established harmony"
(of course with/among Sattva, Rajas & Tamas, and not in any "monadial" sense).
But who knows? (i.e. is this a Zen thing after all?) I guess that's why it is
good to study the history of these debates (or not, if "good" is only
conventionally meaningful anyway).
"BillyG." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- In [email protected], Jonathan Chadwick <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Sattva Purushayoh Atyantasamkirnayoh
>
> Pure consciousness and the active intelligence of Buddhi (the
"Me") >have absolutely nothing to do with one another.
Except that one (Intelligence) is a reflection of the other (Pure
Consciousness). Intelligence is the dynamism and Pure Consciousness is
the Silence.......
---------------------------------
Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user panel
and lay it on us.
