From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of authfriend Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 10:16 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: TIME to BAN LURK
You seem to be suggesting now that it's OK to flame as long as you don't prolong it and don't explicitly proclaim your intention to defy the rules. Is that what you mean to convey? No. Flaming is not so clear-cut as overposting, but if a person is obviously just flaming occasionally, in the hope that he can get away with it, (like driving 7 or 8 or 9 MPH over the speed limit), then it makes my job a lot harder. Out of consideration for me, if nothing else, and out of appreciation for what FFL can be at its best, I would appreciate it if Barry and everyone else did their best to completely refrain from flaming. If one person does it, others feel justified in doing it. So the effect goes far beyond what that one person is doing. Chronic violations should have consequences. No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.14.0/1048 - Release Date: 10/3/2007 8:22 PM
