--- In [email protected], Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Rick, > > Thanks for the reminder, but do you really think that my flaming an > apologist for evil would be out of line? Surely, it cannot be merely > the use of swear words that you're warning me about.
Yeah, what's a few "Fuck you's" among internet strangers? (how do you make FU plural?) > > Additionally, I believe I laid out my reasons for why it might be a > view of some heft that Curtis is, indeed, deserving my, well, let's > call them for what they are: poetic words that attempts to nutshell > something so wrong about a person's core POV that it amounts to being > a menace to culture. That's me, "menace to culture". This may prove to be your best post yet. My exaggerations are merely my way of showing my > emotional response. Posters here often are intellectually dishonest, > and my emotions are one way to snap them to attention, or at the > least, underline for all here about the depth of my stance. Flaming shows an "emotional response"? What a novel concept. So the flaming is for our own good? That's a relief, I thought your were just flaming for selfish purposes. Consider me all "snapped to attention" oh great wise one. > Not that I can prove Curtis to be anything but a, well, all around > good guy, but if I could, if I had more than just his weaselyassed > avoidance of morality here, would you let me then? I'm avoiding "morality" because I banged her once and then she started stalking me. Do not give her my contact info. <Snip> Would > you allow me to flame a pedophile, a dog-fight promoter, murderer, > etc.? One thing I can tell ya, Rick, I'd be putting out my best hate > literature on suchlike, and be proud of it even if I got kicked out of > here for doing so. What a display of subtle virtue, taking a stand against pedophiles and murderers. Brave position Edg, there are so few who are against these things. What a do gooder you are! If only there were more people like you there would be laws against these things... > > What does it take to get one to start acting-out? For me, not much, > but I think everyone here will act out at some point -- depending on > their identification with a POV. > Actually it is only you that I see communicating in this obnoxious way regularly here. > Like my previous post, who will be able to keep their emotions hidden > if someone says they'll vote for any war monger, predator, or ???? > So if someone doesn't vote for your guy (or gal), you should get to flame them for having another opinion? To answer your question, anyone with more maturity concerning people's different POVs than you have, that's who. Most people understand that there is not only one way to look at complex topics, except you. > We have all prided ourselves, as Americans, that the Germans who > killed the Jews were so aberrant in personality as to be labeled evil, > and we imprisoned many who never actually shoved a person into a gas > chamber. I was raised to feel SOOOOO superior to those Germans, and > in fact, if I were to tell anyone here, even now, that I was living as > a German in the town of Auschwitz, why, there'd be no end of the > hatred sent my way by everyone here for the crime of my denial -- it > being an enabling of the actual killers. > > When do we start thinking about the guards at Guantanamo and Abu Graib > this way? They're just following orders, right? Wow speaking out against Abu Graib and Guantanamo now! Does your moral bravery have any limits? > > Same deal with Curtis and Turq refusing to discuss their own personal > styles when it comes to "practical morality." Refusing to be accountable to a flaming lunatic on the Internet? Say it is not true. Turq you had better report to Edg's office for your spanking and you had better not enjoy it mister! I'm bringing my ball gag just in case it gets interesting. It is just their > attitude towards morality that allowed so many to turn a blind eye to > the concentration camps. Yeah Turq, (who is guilty of talking to younger women), we are no better than people ignoring mass murder if we don't discuss our "personal styles" with Edg. Let me avoid another Holocaust here by revealing a partiality towards the Columbia Sportswear look, for the sake of the children. I'm guessing Edg's "practical morality" boils down to never getting laid. <Snip> > > Not that everything any culture does is evil, remember the Maharishi > Effect -- same deal for evil -- only need the square root of one > percent of the population to be evil for the whole culture to be > skewed that way. The Reverse Maharishi Effect is born! Just as coherent as as the program vibes but with much hotter chicks. I host a group evil program at my place regularly and it really deepens my experiences of "skewing" the culture. > > Stand up and be counted folks. Sig Heil, Sig Heil! The powers that be have taken their > stance. If you don't stand up against evil in the subtle > manifestations, you're doomed to seeing the emerge as war, etc. Flame on solders of Edg, it is your duty to society or we will have wars. Are Edg's pompous morality lectures going to be the only protection we have against future wars? It is your moral duty to say "Fuck you" to anyone who disagrees with you. It spreads goodness. (I'm a little unclear on the link here but I'm sure Edg will explain it in a future uplifting epistle) where > you WILL BE powerless to mitigate, but on individuals, you have a > chance to sway them -- with reason, emotion, or, in the case of Turq, > a big two-by-four across the face by an angry "traditional" father. > You use a lot of violent images in your posts Edg. I'm gunna guess it is because you feel powerless in your real life. > Edg That was fun, thanks. > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Behalf Of Sal Sunshine > > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 1:42 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 9-11 -- The Inside Job was merely a > blip > > (snip .... thought police) > > > > > > > > On Oct 29, 2007, at 10:56 AM, Duveyoung wrote: > > > > Fuck you Curtis...Fuck you, you enabling bastard...you cowardly > spin-master > > for evil... your immorality...cold-heartedness... try to besmirch me > and my > > essay...I condemn you...evil's apologist....What a disappointment, > what joke > > for a personality,what a sell out... How you manage to still love > anything > > is astounding... > > > > > > Still committed to elevating the dialog and cleaning up the place, I > see. :) > > > > Careful, Edg, or Bronte might swoon when she sees your latest rap. > > > > Sal > > > > Ahem. Etiquette police here. Please tone it down a bit Edg. > > > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1097 - Release Date: > 10/28/2007 > > 1:58 PM > > >
