Okay, I've got Edg. throwing wild punches in the air, and Curtis delivering body blow after body blow into Edg's mid-section. I'm calling this fight. It's Curtis in five rounds. Edg has a deep cut over his left eye as well that won't stop bleeding. Curtis, I gotta say, it was awesome. Folks, don't pick a fight with this guy!
lurk --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], Duveyoung <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > Rick, > > > > Thanks for the reminder, but do you really think that my flaming an > > apologist for evil would be out of line? Surely, it cannot be merely > > the use of swear words that you're warning me about. > > Yeah, what's a few "Fuck you's" among internet strangers? (how do you > make FU plural?) > > > > > Additionally, I believe I laid out my reasons for why it might be a > > view of some heft that Curtis is, indeed, deserving my, well, let's > > call them for what they are: poetic words that attempts to nutshell > > something so wrong about a person's core POV that it amounts to > being > a menace to culture. > > That's me, "menace to culture". This may prove to be your best post yet. > > My exaggerations are merely my way of showing my > emotional > response. Posters here often are intellectually dishonest, > > and my emotions are one way to snap them to attention, or at the > > least, underline for all here about the depth of my stance. > > Flaming shows an "emotional response"? What a novel concept. So the > flaming is for our own good? That's a relief, I thought your were > just flaming for selfish purposes. Consider me all "snapped to > attention" oh great wise one. > > > Not that I can prove Curtis to be anything but a, well, all around > > good guy, but if I could, if I had more than just his weaselyassed > > avoidance of morality here, would you let me then? > > I'm avoiding "morality" because I banged her once and then she started > stalking me. Do not give her my contact info. > > <Snip> > > Would > you allow me to flame a pedophile, a dog-fight promoter, > murderer, > etc.? One thing I can tell ya, Rick, I'd be putting out > my best hate > literature on suchlike, and be proud of it even if I > got kicked out of > here for doing so. > > What a display of subtle virtue, taking a stand against pedophiles and > murderers. Brave position Edg, there are so few who are against these > things. What a do gooder you are! If only there were more people > like you there would be laws against these things... > > > > > What does it take to get one to start acting-out? For me, not much, > > but I think everyone here will act out at some point -- depending on > > their identification with a POV. > > > > Actually it is only you that I see communicating in this obnoxious way > regularly here. > > > Like my previous post, who will be able to keep their emotions hidden > > if someone says they'll vote for any war monger, predator, or ???? > > > > So if someone doesn't vote for your guy (or gal), you should get to > flame them for having another opinion? To answer your question, > anyone with more maturity concerning people's different POVs than you > have, that's who. Most people understand that there is not only one > way to look at complex topics, except you. > > > > We have all prided ourselves, as Americans, that the Germans who > > killed the Jews were so aberrant in personality as to be labeled evil, > > and we imprisoned many who never actually shoved a person into a gas > > chamber. I was raised to feel SOOOOO superior to those Germans, and > > in fact, if I were to tell anyone here, even now, that I was living as > > a German in the town of Auschwitz, why, there'd be no end of the > > hatred sent my way by everyone here for the crime of my denial - - it > > being an enabling of the actual killers. > > > > When do we start thinking about the guards at Guantanamo and Abu Graib > > this way? They're just following orders, right? > > Wow speaking out against Abu Graib and Guantanamo now! Does your > moral bravery have any limits? > > > > > Same deal with Curtis and Turq refusing to discuss their own > personal > styles when it comes to "practical morality." > > Refusing to be accountable to a flaming lunatic on the Internet? Say > it is not true. Turq you had better report to Edg's office for your > spanking and you had better not enjoy it mister! I'm bringing my ball > gag just in case it gets interesting. > > It is just their > attitude towards morality that allowed so many to > turn a blind eye to > the concentration camps. > > Yeah Turq, (who is guilty of talking to younger women), we are no > better than people ignoring mass murder if we don't discuss our > "personal styles" with Edg. Let me avoid another Holocaust here by > revealing a partiality towards the Columbia Sportswear look, for the > sake of the children. I'm guessing Edg's "practical morality" boils > down to never getting laid. > > <Snip> > > > > Not that everything any culture does is evil, remember the Maharishi > > Effect -- same deal for evil -- only need the square root of one > > percent of the population to be evil for the whole culture to be > > skewed that way. > > The Reverse Maharishi Effect is born! Just as coherent as as the > program vibes but with much hotter chicks. I host a group evil > program at my place regularly and it really deepens my experiences of > "skewing" the culture. > > > > > Stand up and be counted folks. > > Sig Heil, Sig Heil! > > The powers that be have taken their > > stance. If you don't stand up against evil in the subtle > > manifestations, you're doomed to seeing the emerge as war, etc. > > Flame on solders of Edg, it is your duty to society or we will have > wars. Are Edg's pompous morality lectures going to be the only > protection we have against future wars? It is your moral duty to say > "Fuck you" to anyone who disagrees with you. It spreads goodness. > (I'm a little unclear on the link here but I'm sure Edg will explain > it in a future uplifting epistle) > > where > > you WILL BE powerless to mitigate, but on individuals, you have a > > chance to sway them -- with reason, emotion, or, in the case of Turq, > > a big two-by-four across the face by an angry "traditional" father. > > > > You use a lot of violent images in your posts Edg. I'm gunna guess it > is because you feel powerless in your real life. > > > > Edg > > That was fun, thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > On Behalf Of Sal Sunshine > > > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 1:42 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 9-11 -- The Inside Job was merely a > > blip > > > (snip .... thought police) > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 29, 2007, at 10:56 AM, Duveyoung wrote: > > > > > > Fuck you Curtis...Fuck you, you enabling bastard...you cowardly > > spin-master > > > for evil... your immorality...cold-heartedness... try to besmirch me > > and my > > > essay...I condemn you...evil's apologist....What a disappointment, > > what joke > > > for a personality,what a sell out... How you manage to still love > > anything > > > is astounding... > > > > > > > > > Still committed to elevating the dialog and cleaning up the place, I > > see. :) > > > > > > Careful, Edg, or Bronte might swoon when she sees your latest rap. > > > > > > Sal > > > > > > Ahem. Etiquette police here. Please tone it down a bit Edg. > > > > > > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1097 - Release Date: > > 10/28/2007 > > > 1:58 PM > > > > > >
