In a message dated 11/10/07 8:31:21 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would think somebody with ten years experience teaching > constitutional law could rattle off, in a couple of seconds, > a couple of the more egregious examples he would reverse. > But.... maybe not. I'm sure he could have. But he may have assumed, probably quite correctly, that in a crowd where such a question would come up in the first place that everyone would already be all too aware of the more egregious examples, at the very least, so he didn't really need to spell them out and would make better use of his limited time by answering other questions. Spelling out one or two points, if only briefly, would have been a selling point of why he should be elected. He missed an opportunity to show his mastery of Constitutional Law to people that may vote for him. ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
