--- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@>
wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rflex@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin"
<jflanegi@>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected], "Rory Goff"
<rorygoff@>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In [email protected], "do.rflex"
<do.rflex@>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Simple facts speak for themselves.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > It is true also that regarding the TMO and
> > > > > > > Maharishi I prefer to see the glass half full vs half
or
> > > > entirely
> > > > > > > empty.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Again. Simple facts speak for themselves. They don't
require
> > your
> > > > > > preferences of how they should be seen.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > An interesting view. It looks kind of inside-out from
here, as
> > > > mine in
> > > > > turn would probably look to you :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > In mine at the moment, there appears to coexist a sea of
> > mutually-
> > > > > contradictory "simple facts" or data among which my inner
> > > > preference,
> > > > > bias or "mood" automatically selects or "magnetizes" those
> > which
> > > > align
> > > > > with it, to support and sustain a world "out there" in
> > consonance
> > > > with
> > > > > itself.
> > > > >
> > > > Actually it *has* to be that way in our universe to support
such
> > > > diversity-- this intimate moment by moment interplay between
our
> > > > individuated forms and our surroundings; mutual selection.
If
> > not,
> > > > growth and diversity would be truly impossible (hint hint-
lol).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bananas.
> > >
> > I think we have a split!
>
>
> I think we have two jokers who intentionally disconnect from simple
> accountability.
>
OK-- you...and who else??
