--- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" <rorygoff@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote: > > > > > > Simple facts speak for themselves. > > > > > > > > > > It is true also that regarding the TMO and > > > > Maharishi I prefer to see the glass half full vs half or > entirely > > > > empty. > > > > > > > > > Again. Simple facts speak for themselves. They don't require your > > > preferences of how they should be seen. > > > > > > > An interesting view. It looks kind of inside-out from here, as > mine in > > turn would probably look to you :-) > > > > In mine at the moment, there appears to coexist a sea of mutually- > > contradictory "simple facts" or data among which my inner > preference, > > bias or "mood" automatically selects or "magnetizes" those which > align > > with it, to support and sustain a world "out there" in consonance > with > > itself. > > > Actually it *has* to be that way in our universe to support such > diversity-- this intimate moment by moment interplay between our > individuated forms and our surroundings; mutual selection. If not, > growth and diversity would be truly impossible (hint hint- lol).
Bananas.
