--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I wouldn't say that New Age tendencies in the U.S. are likely to 
lead to a fascist regime for three reasons (which comment and expand 
upon one another endlessy).  1) causal relationships are difficult 
enough to distinguish from 100% correlations in the "hard" sciences.  
In the area of intellectual history it would be next to impossible.

I'd say it's extremely unlikely on its face, because
(a) there aren't that many New Age devotees in the U.S.;
(b) "New Age" is not sectarian--it encompasses a very
wide range of very different belief systems; and (c)
what New Age beliefs do tend to have in common is a
loathing for war and strong opposition to fascist-style
thinking and to injustice and intolerance of any kind.

> 2) There are many ways to see history, but they fall essentially 
into two camps.  One is the "shit happens" theory of history, which 
is generally preferred by the academic establishment.  They tend to 
write things like so-and-so "came to power" or "the war broke out."

Well, they do if they're writing an outline for
high school students. But if they're writing
scholarly papers or books, they're likely to go
deeply into causes. So I don't think it makes any
sense to say the "shit happens" theory is preferred
by the academic establishment.

> The other is the "conspiracy nut" point of view, which is expressed 
by Franklin D. Roosevelt when he says, "In politics, nothing happens 
by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way."

Maybe it was expressed by FDR, maybe it wasn't. I've
never seen it sourced (so there's no way of knowing
the context), and I have seen it attributed both to
FDR and Teddy Roosevelt; so probably just as well not
to hold it up as an authoritative conclusion born of 
significant experience.

If either of them actually said it, it's entirely
possible it was a throwaway line referring to some
relatively minor incident that appeared spontaneous
but turned out to have been planned.

In other words, it may not have much of any bearing
on the issue at hand.

That said--

> The truth must lie somewhere in between those two extremes

--you're surely right about this.

> but, as you know, I tend toward the conspiracy nut perspective by 
virtue of my programming.

Which you seem to be trying to impose on us.

It's usually possible to change one's programming,
you know, if it turns out not to hold up under
examination.

<snip>
> Given all that, what I see in today's world is a contraction into 
fascism.  I've seen it before.  Why does it happen and is it evil, is 
it necessary and if not how can it be avoided?  Those are not, 
ultimately, questions I can answer.  But here is how it looks to me.  
People (who look like us) are leading the world into a period in 
which hell on earth looks pretty much like what I was born into in 
1940 in Berlin.  Why are they doing it? Or is this just part of the 
cyclical shit that happens in the history of an intelligent species? 
It sure looks to me that those leading us into such an unpleasant 
experience use religion, whether it's new age or christian or 
whatever, to herd us down that road.  That doesn't necessarily mean 
that either religion or new age practice is not also all the good 
things they claim to be. 
> 
> How does it look to you?

Well, we certainly aren't marching firmly *away* from
fascism. We're definitely in a dangerous period, where
all kinds of pretty awful things could happen because of
the twisted perspectives of those in power and those who
support them.

But it's not always religion that is used to create an
oppressive regime (unless you want to define "religion"
so loosely that it encompasses, say, Marxism-Leninism).

It does seem, however, that Christianity has greater
potential to be used that way than have New Age-type
spiritual movements, because of Christianity's
exclusivist theology and its moralism via St. Paul,
not to mention the apocalypticism of some of its
branches.

I have no doubt there are powers behind the scenes
who are working on various nefarious schemes to
further what they see as their own self-interest, or
who may even be motivated by idealism of some sort.

But I think the purported New Age connection is about
as flimsy as any conspiracy theory I've ever come
across.


Reply via email to