Assuming you're addressing my post, although you didn't bother to quote: --- In [email protected], steven klayman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Would you not agree that the TMO teaches a flying > technique and no one is flying.
Uh, yes. Did you really believe I wouldn't? > If so I believe science would invalidate the TMO > claims that they can teach people to fly. Certainly makes the claim dubious, but science can't *invalidate* something that is predicted to happen at some unstated time in the future. And we don't need science to "invalidate" the claim that soaring-through-the-air flying is actually going on now, since nobody is making that claim. > Perhaps a refund would be in order. At least since I took the TM-Sidhis course, there's been a detailed disclaimer you have to sign before you can even pay the fee, stating that you haven't been promised any specific results. > They have also been claiming this state of CVC takes > 5-8 years to achieve. (I think you mean "CC," right?) Again, that prediction was made *quite* some time ago; it hasn't been made for many years, as far as I'm aware. Obviously it was overly optimistic for most people. > How many 5-8 year programs have you been on and has CC > been achieved? > I rest my case I'm not sure "make a case" means what you think it means, either scientifically or legally.
