--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "dhamiltony2k5" > <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote: > > > > Dear Off_World, whoever you are, i think it is a brilliant position > > you take and try to entrench. I am with you on that. But, where is > > its virtue if it is not coupled with social progress? It is like you > > thrust with "peer review science" and then unable to stand up along > > with the argument you run the other way taking its conclusions with > > you. You could have been an ayatollah in the larger TM-jihad along > > with the likes of Jon Hagelin but you drop the banner? What are you > > afraid of in your thinking? That Rick or Alex might reveal your > > identity here and that you would get banned from the Dome? > > > > I am intriqued with your seeming virtue, whoever you are. Your > > seeming principle & cool humility. Just on the brink as you deploy > > it, you then spurn TM-jihad by declining to lead it further. It is > > laid in your lap and you declined it. You could have been an > > Ayatollah. A spiritual leader of jihad. A "Captain", a leader of > > citizen Meditators for the Age of Enlightenment. > > Not to *mention* having 72 virgins waiting for > you in Bramhaloka if you get snuffed in the > process of leading the TM-jihad. > > And the brilliant part of this, from the TMO > point of view, is that they only need a *total* > of 72 virgins. The TM-jihad martyrs die and go > to Brahmaloka, and after they get there the 72 > virgins *remain* virgins, because these dickless > wonders can't think of anything to do with them > except have them wash their robes and polish > their crowns. :-)>>
Another smear capmaign by the anti-science fundamentalist Turq. T This is typical behaviour of people like Ted Haggard, George Bush, Ayatollah Khomeini, Gerry Falwell, etc. You belong in the dark ages with them. Only research published in respected peer-reviewed scientific journals holds any weight in the 21st century. Get used to it. OffWorld
