Judy wrote:
> For the record, while there are three references
> to "angels," there is only one to "gods," plural.
> All the rest are to "God," singular, capitalized,
> and many of these are in phrases such as "God
> consciousness" and "God realization"--i.e.,
> enlightenment.
>
So, it has been established that Maharishi doesn't actually
talk about the "gods" in SBAL, except in one single instance
refering to "gods," plural. Maharishi doesn't actualy name
any of the "gods" and he doesn't seem to talk much about any
"angels" either. Would there be any angels in Hinduism to
talk about, in any case? But I wonder why Maharishi didn't
mention the yakshis or the asparsas in SBAL. Which just goes
to prove that, contrary to what Edg implied, Maharishi
didn't talk much about religion, gods, angels or demons when
he composed SBAL.
