On Feb 6, 2008, at 9:07 PM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote:
Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Who Maharishi is/was depends upon your experience of him, not some
ridiculous criteria of what occurs after death. I'm sure in the
history of the human race some
exalted saints have decayed like mere mortals and others have
stayed fresh as a daisy. The whole thing is pretty gross though,
isn't it?
I understand, but the photo which supposedly shows Maharishi in
repose, does not look like someone who is deceased. And it Vaj's
criteria is accurate, then I think it is a pretty neat parting shot.
Indeed it would be -- at least for me.