>
> ----You like coming back at opinions with less than one liners. 
But they are meaningless. Often. How about explaining how talking
about interstellar dark matter and so on is anything less than
egotism and elitism.

How about explaining how you can hope to keep up with John Hagelin's
understanding, however skewed it may be, of such things?
 
 
-----I keep up with him by not needing to keep up with him.



>
> As with many people who have made themselves immune to formal
discussion by taking the most esoteric POV that they could muster,
Haeglen also has made himself a heavenly arbour bower in his mind. 
One of math and physics, none of which can at present be proven. He
is a pseudo scientist, not a real scientist.  He gave up his lab
jacket for an open ticket to Maharishi mano a mano.
>


That might be, but again, what evidence do we have that you are
capable of judging Hagelin's credentials, current or former, when it
comes to science?
 
 
----I go by what his peers say and they consider him a quack.


> I never heard him say one thing to another person that wasn't
completely condescending. It's all theory. Do you think Lawson that
that's what enlightenment is?  Some extra special theoritician-
ability?
>

I've had face-to-face meetings with Hagelin where we discussed
esoteric theories. I never got the impression that he was being
condenscending to me. Of course, perhaps I am too unsubtle to catch
the nuances that you are able to catch?
 
I spent four years at MIU as part of his congregation.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to