--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > <snip> > > Soon it'll be "Gotta Get Ruth," because Ruth's cred- > > ence and intelligence here on FFL are growing at the > > same time that Judy's are decreasing. > > Dream on, Barry. Wishing doesn't make it so. > > I've admired Ruth's contributions ever since she > arrived (and I've told her so in private email; > ask her). > > I simply don't think her latest TM-related posts > have been up to her usual standards of objectivity. > She recognizes that herself: "For some reason, > I'm rapidly losing my openmindedness," she wrote.
I rest my case. There it is, an obvious attempt to bait Ruth into an argument.
