Although Tony Nader is a good person I believe the only logical and appropriate solution to the problem of Maharishi-jee's succession would be Brahmachari Nandikeeshore, and amazing devotee and extremely dignified person with a rare combination of spirituality and humor. It's a dissapointment he is not mentioned "even" as a Raja. I don't want to speculate why (he's not Shrivastava but no other Shrivastawas was apointed either)... Also: Raja för India: Harris Kaplan - not even an Indian. He is said to have donated amazing amounts to the Indian TMO, but does that qualify him to lead India to glory? Anyway "no hard feelings"... Sab bhaagya rekha mei likha hei.
--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mar 13, 2008, at 12:46 PM, Louis McKenzie wrote: > > > Maybe in some months more and more Tm meditators will find there > > way to the Art of Living??? I was realizing that maybe Maharishi > > was not senile when he ousted Chopra and denounced Sri Sri Ravi. > > Maybe it was for them to go out in the world and do as they have > > done. Now it is not a question of Ravi's ambition or Chopra's > > need for glory that would make them adopt so many of us. Maybe > > the Royal Highness of Rajah Ram will be there to reflect the design > > of ideal and to provide world guidance from the level of the > > unified field. Yet the actual guru maybe will be SRI SRI. > > > > I can not see Tony Nader as a guru..... Sri Sri Ravi Shankar has > > proven himself....... > > You can't help but wonder that. > > Of course in a very real sense, the Art of Living Foundation already > IS the new TM movement. They've got the numbers, they've got the > excitement and they've got one hell of a nice guru. > > TM 2.0 as I like to call it. >
