--- In [email protected], "Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > http://tinyurl.com/38tm9g > > > > An iSkin? Sounds like a new brand of condom. > > > > I guess in a way it is: "Practice safe ranting; > > sheath your weapon." :-) > > > > > I wonder what happened to Ruth. Hope she just is just busy with > > > work and life and that the negativity her last posts were met > > > with did not chase her away. > > > > Indeed. I suspect that the tendency here to damn > > the individual because one doesn't agree with what > > they are saying is a bit of a shocker. > > > > > She has a good heart and great spirit and added to > > > this board. > > > > Indeed. > > > > A perusal of the archives indicates she would not be the first. Message > boards can be a > bit rough. Common civility is lost easily. I must admit restraining myself > from lashing out > and asking if a poster had skipped taking court ordered meds. I would think > less of > myself if I should. Now, tellin someone to GFY is different.<just kiddin> > > Vaj and Judy seem to have different perspectives on her returning...among > other things. > <grin> > The note Vaj posted makes perfect sense. She is a professional in her field > who was often > kneecapped here by people that could learn a lot by listening. Questioning > integrity was > poison in her world. Thoughtlessness and malice has a cost. It is rare to > have a > knowledge resource such as her, with humanness, on a board like this. > > > > >
LOL. She showed, over and over again, that she hadn't even bothered to read the URLs I posted and then, rather than saying "well, I haven't had time yet," she instead left in a huff. You have an interesting definition of "integrity" here. Lawson
