--- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, the Artist *uses* Science, but usually not the other way
around.
> >
> > Lawson
>
>
> I believe that for a person who grew up in a developed county in
the
> last 80 years the assimilation of some of the principles of science
> are a given. Even spirituality often uses uses proof systems that
> appear to be empirical to some degree. It is only after proffered
> evidence is show to be lacking does the rejection of all science
> usually take place IME.
>
> Even the New Testament tries to build a case for Jesus' divinity
based
> on the performance of physical miracles witnessed and reported by
> numbers of people. It surprised me on a re-read in the last few
years
> how much time is spent trying to make this case. There is much
more
> time spent on the miracles than any of his presentation of ethical
> philosophy which he gets so much undeserved credit for IMO.
>
speaking of evidence, I can't find any at all that the fellow even
existed, much less his divinity. one day I just looked inside myself
and asked myself where is the proof that such a person Jesus ever
existed? and I have yet to find any.
