--- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Apr 5, 2008, at 11:57 AM, authfriend wrote: > > >> So you are not a Sidha Lawson? > > > > He is a Sidha. He's talking about plain-vanilla TM > > above. > > So you clipped off the other questions satvadude asked, Judy? > Presumably they weren't convenient ones, even though you know the > answers.
He asked only one other question, actually, Sal. The fact that he's a Sidha eliminated all the others. I don't know the answer to the last question, and neither do you. Lawson hasn't said anything recently about his current regularity or non-, at least not that I've seen. If he chooses, he can respond to that one. No cigar, sorry. So here they > are again: > > So you are not a Sidha Lawson? Why? Such a strong > proponent of the teachings but never taken the > sidhis? Why? Is it true what I have read here that > you are not regular in your meditations? Why?
