The Invasion of Iraq was based upon current intelligence reports current meaning post 2001. The weapons inspectors reported that he did not have any WMDs but Bush's special home made intelligence said that he did have. One thing I love about the internet is all you have to do is go to Youtube or google and research. then you will learn whatever you need to know. Several members of the bush administration have written books about his burning desire to attack Iraq. His attack was not based up the 80's. --- "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Louis McKenzie wrote: > > > > Saddam never had weapons of mass destruction > no > > > > chemical warfare ability none of what was > stated. > > > > > Richard J. Williams wrote: > > > So, how, exactly, did Saddam murder the Kurd > women > > > "with the babies in their arms" if he had no > weapons > > > of mass destruction and no chemical weapons? > > > > ColdBlu wrote: > > ..with chemical weapons GW's daddy gave Saddam in > the > > 80's when GHW Bush was Vice President. > > > There's no evidence that GW's daddy gave Saddam > mustard > gas in the 80's. If you have any evidence of this, > why not > post it so we can read it and decide for ourselves? > > In fact, Saddam's mustard gas was made from dual-use > products obtained from France, Germany, and China. > > Speaking of 'talking ass' - according to Judy, no > weapons > of mass destruction were found in Iraq. So, what > happened > to the weapons of mass destruction that GW's daddy > supposedly gave to Saddam? > > > ------------------------------------ > > To subscribe, send a message to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Or go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ > and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links > > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
