My point was written off of Sal's comment Jim.  It concerned the
implications of Karmic theory concerning unfortunate lives.  My point
was that I don't accept that any human understands any of this and I
am not convinced or impressed with Karmic theory's attempt to explain
life's inner mechanism.  I specifically thanked everyone who
contributed to the discussion including you in an attempt to avoid
this kind of post.


--- In [email protected], "sandiego108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], Angela Mailander 
> <mailander111@> wrote:
> >
> > I've not had time to follow this whole thread, but,
> > reading this post at random, I'd say that Sal and
> > Curtis are doing a fine job defending my ass.  The
> > only thing about karma that I know for sure is that it
> > is as  unfathomable as God (its alleged author) is; if
> > there ain't one, then karma is as unfathomable as the
> > great and universal as well as necessarily eternal
> > abyss of human ignorance is. 
> > 
> > That being the case (and it's airtight), I'd have to
> > say that any statement about what anyone deserves in
> > this world is arrogant, stupid, and cruel, not to
> > mention narrow-minded.  <snip>
> 
> How childish of you, Sal and Curtis, given my remark that the 
> Universe operates in an absolutely neutral way, and THEREFORE 
> everyone gets exactly what they deserve. 
> 
> Again, you haven't answered, nor has weasely Sal, nor Curtis, about 
> why you instantly assumed I am talking about what is deserved from a 
> standpoint of suffering. Not one of the three of you has given me a 
> reason why you run my words through this peculiar filter.
> 
> I can only conclude that the Universe, according to Angela, Sal and 
> Curtis gives some what they deserve, and others are treated 
> differently, specially. Why some of us are singled out, and the rest 
> of us must merely make do with all of the universal laws is a 
> mystery to me. Sounds just as arrogant, stupid, and cruel, not to 
> mention as narrow-minded as my words strike you. 
> 
> Gee I hope the three of you end up in the select group that is not 
> subject to the neutral laws of the universe. Oh right, you're 
> already there. In that case, I bow down to the god-like egos of 
> Angela, Sal and Curtis. I will leave the three of you to your very 
> special place in the Universe, and go back to the other 
> 99.99999999999%. 
> 
> Sounds truly insane to me, but if you folks are happy with it, OK.
>


Reply via email to