Secret Iraqi Deal Shows Problems in Arms OrdersPublished: April 13, 2008  
Different day, same schieszenhoisier
   BAGHDAD — An $833 million Iraqi arms deal secretly negotiated with Serbia 
has underscored Iraq’s continuing problems equipping its armed forces, a 
process that has long been plagued by corruption and inefficiency.  
 

Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki, center, with Defense Minister Abdul Qadir 
in February. Mr. Qadir has drawn criticism for his role in engineering an $833 
million deal to buy military equipment from Serbia, a deal that was later 
scaled back.  
  
Lt. Gen. James M. Dubik, center, with Iraqi officers in March. He is the head 
of America’s security advisory mission in Iraq.  
 

The deal was also supported by Iraq’s Office of the Commander in Chief, a 
shadowy group of Shiite advisers to Mr. Maliki that American officials accused 
last year of leading a purge of Sunni Iraqi Army commanders who had cracked 
down on Shiite militia leaders.  
    The same group, which rejected suggestions that it bring in Western 
advisers, has marginalized senior uniformed officers charged with procurement 
decisions and kept American officials in the dark about Iraqi financing of arms 
deals, according to high-ranking American officials familiar with its workings. 
“It struck me as bizarre,” said a Western official with knowledge of the 
security ministries, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he did not 
want to be seen as criticizing people he was advising. “You can only explain it 
in two ways: a desire to avoid oversight and a desire to offer opportunities 
for graft and corruption.”
A high-ranking Iraqi government official who spoke on condition of anonymity, 
for fear of reprisals against him and others in his office, said, “We have no 
confidence in the Iraqi contracting process.” 
“I heard about it out of the blue, that the minister of defense took a 
delegation to Serbia and came back and said that he had signed deals with the 
Serbian prime minister,” the official said. “Why Serbia? Why not Ukraine? Why 
not Russia? We just don’t know.”
 American military officials did persuade Mr. Qadir to cancel the $200 million 
purchase of 30 to 40 French-made Puma helicopters, arguing that they were 
unsuited to Iraq’s harsh climate. The minister also decided against buying 
armored personnel carriers and Gazelle helicopters.
American and Iraqi military officers also questioned the wisdom of purchasing 
tens of millions of dollars of nonmilitary crowd control gear — batons, stun 
guns and plexiglass shields — usually used by police forces, and $76 million 
worth of mortar systems, which are too imprecise to use against guerrillas. The 
minister said he still intended to buy the riot control equipment, to handle 
crowds of Shiite pilgrims, and mortar systems, because the insurgents have 
them. 
Critics of the deal also complained that the arms agreement thwarted the 
standardization of the Iraqi Army’s hodgepodge of war matériel, which includes 
firearms from the United States, China, the Balkans, Pakistan and Russia; 150 
types of land vehicles; and a United Nations panoply of aircraft.
By SOLOMON MOORE  

 __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to