--- In [email protected], sgrayatlarge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Hey Curtis,
> 
> Do I really  need to respond to someone who labels me a murder 
loving 
> creep warmonger, neo-con, hey throw in Nazi while he's at?
> 
> Didn't you know Curtis, all along that I'm part of the great Cabal 
to 
> ruin all life and limb for personal gain?



As the officially designated murder-loving creep, Shemp McGurk, may I 
welcome you to the club.

Perhaps, together, we can determine which areas of the Third World 
are most deserving of America's and Haliburton's bombs.




> 
> I bet you didn't know that I made billions while at Avon Park?
> 
> Or was that a $50 stipend?
> 
> Too much rounding at the time.
> 
> Take care
> 
> Signed
> 
> Murder loving Creep who loves War!
> 
> --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" 
> <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> >
> > no
> > > child IN THE ENTIRE WORLD dies because of dirty water, bad 
> nutrition,
> > > etc.  Only with such measures can we ever hope to mend the 
fences 
> and
> > > let the dark memories fade over the decades.  
> > > 
> > > Failing this, the third world will continue to produce
> > > terrorists....and thus the war profiteers will have their 
windfall
> > > profits.
> > 
> > 
> > Edg,
> > 
> > Aside from the fact that Steve is a great guy who doesn't deserve 
a
> > tirade...
> > 
> > This perspective on terrorism is a myth.  None of the 9-11 
hijackers
> > were poor.  I'm all for human aid to poor countries but trying to 
> link
> > this to the war on terror has been proven to be bogus.    
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], Duveyoung <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Sgrayatlarge,
> > > 
> > > You've been posting way too many supportive-to-war pieces here 
> lately,
> > > so yeah, I'm thinking you're a murder loving creep like Shemp 
and 
> the
> > > War Monger.  
> > > 
> > > Tell us all plainly: do you discount the carnage on children and
> > > innocents like FFL's resident War Monger does -- is such carnage
> > > acceptable to you for the imagined political gains?  Would you 
> cheer
> > > if Hillary nukes Iran?
> > > 
> > > Iran's leaders say what has to be said in order to keep their 
> jobs --
> > > to spotlight them personally is entirely missing the point.
> > > 
> > > It is the will of Iran's people that keeps their leaders 
> employed, and
> > > what the War Monger, and you too it seems, are ignoring is the 
> ENTIRE
> > > HISTORY OF THE WESTERN POWERS ABUSING THE ISLAMIC CULTURE, and 
how
> > > that has created the very mindset we see today.  Tell us,
> > > Sgrayatlarge, what would you do if Canada had nukes and America 
> didn't
> > > and regularly the Canadians bombed our nuke research facilities 
> which
> > > killed your child in collateral damage?  What would you do if 
> Canada
> > > simply declared that California and Oregon and Washington were 
to 
> be a
> > > new country run by a militarily imposed de facto dictatorship?
> > > 
> > > I'm no lover of burkas etc., in fact, of all the major 
religions, 
> I
> > > find Islam to be the one that most disgusts me, but I find every
> > > religion generally to be immorally power-seeking, but to ignore 
> what
> > > has been done in the past to alienate the Muslim nations is to 
> be, in
> > > fact, a collaborationist for BigBiz.
> > > 
> > > War itself must be demonized, and that means that only 
> extraordinary
> > > peace-supporting efforts would do when it comes to international
> > > politics.  An example of extraordinary effort would be: making 
> sure no
> > > child IN THE ENTIRE WORLD dies because of dirty water, bad 
> nutrition,
> > > etc.  Only with such measures can we ever hope to mend the 
fences 
> and
> > > let the dark memories fade over the decades.  
> > > 
> > > Failing this, the third world will continue to produce
> > > terrorists....and thus the war profiteers will have their 
windfall
> > > profits.
> > > 
> > > How you respond to this post is critical in that you're either 
> part of
> > > the problem or part of the solution.  Do you have the guts to 
> plainly
> > > tell us that killing children for oil doesn't bother you?
> > > 
> > > Edg
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  --- In [email protected], sgrayatlarge <no_reply@> 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Oh right, that big campaign by the neocons and you know what
> > > > their is no homosexual problem in Iran either.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks for setting the record straight on that great guy
> > > > who really needs a shave
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --- In [email protected], bob_brigante 
<no_reply@> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In [email protected], sgrayatlarge 
> <no_reply@> 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Defending Ahmadinejad...
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Classy
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > **********
> > > > > 
> > > > > Just as there was a mendacious campaign by neocons to get 
the 
> > > > country 
> > > > > behind the war with Iraq, there has been an attempt to 
> demonize 
> > > > > Ahmadinejad by those same neocon elements, in order to 
> justify 
> > > > > another war in the Middle East. Think the scheeple are 
stupid 
> > > > enough 
> > > > > to buy this? Personally, I'll pass.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > -- In [email protected], bob_brigante 
> <no_reply@> 
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" 
> > > > > <shempmcgurk@> 
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "feste37" 
> <feste37@> 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This discussion is so twisted in its logic. Iran 
does 
> not 
> > > > > have 
> > > > > > > > nuclear
> > > > > > > > > weapons. Israel does. So why are people creating 
> fictional 
> > > > > > > scenarios
> > > > > > > > > of Iran nuking Israel?
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 1) Because all indications are that, like North Korea 
> before 
> > > > > > them, 
> > > > > > > as 
> > > > > > > > they are with full speed ahead enriching uranium and 
> only 
> > > > > > claiming 
> > > > > > > it 
> > > > > > > > is for use in generating electricity that, in 
reality, 
> they 
> > > > are 
> > > > > > > doing 
> > > > > > > > it to make nuclear bombs; and
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 2) Because, time and time and yet time again, the 
> elected 
> > > > > > > > representative of the Iranians, Mr. Ahmedehejad, has 
> said 
> > > > that 
> > > > > > > Israel 
> > > > > > > > will be wiped off the map.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > ***********
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Ahmadinejad did not say that he was going to destroy 
> Israel -- 
> > > > > the 
> > > > > > > more reasonable translation of what he was saying was 
> that the 
> > > > > name 
> > > > > > > of Israel is not going to be on future maps of the 
Middle 
> > > > East, 
> > > > > and 
> > > > > > > I'm quite sure that will happen within a generation or 
> two:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad_and_Israel
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > It's the ultimate hypocrisy for the U.S. to OK Israel's 
> > > > enormous 
> > > > > > > cache of nuclear weapons while insisting that other 
> countries 
> > > > do 
> > > > > > not 
> > > > > > > have the same right to WMD to assert their national 
> interests, 
> > > > > and 
> > > > > > as 
> > > > > > > noted in another post, the U.S. has had to back down on 
> this 
> > > > > > > untenable position:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > "VIENNA (AP) — Facing international opposition, U.S. 
> > > > negotiators 
> > > > > at 
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > nuclear meeting have dropped their insistence on a ban 
on 
> the 
> > > > > > transfer
> > > > > > > of uranium enrichment technology to non-nuclear states, 
> > > > diplomats 
> > > > > > said
> > > > > > > Tuesday.
> > > > > > > The compromise, which moves American closer to the 
> positions 
> > > > of 
> > > > > > other
> > > > > > > nations selling nuclear technology and material, is 
> important 
> > > > > > because
> > > > > > > it could give ammunition to Iran, which is under U.N. 
> > > > sanctions 
> > > > > for
> > > > > > > defying a Security Council demand that it give up its 
> > > > enrichment
> > > > > > > program.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > (more) http://tinyurl.com/4c78tk
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to