--- In [email protected], "yifuxero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ---No - that's only the Neo-Advaitin state of non-duality, not > Enlightenment. There's a big gulf between the Neo-Advaitin state as > described below (and exhibited by numerous Neo-Advaitins giving a > similar description of non-duality); and Enlightenment as > demonstrated by Sakyamuni Buddha, Ramana Maharshi, and Guru Dev. > In short, although Enlightenment is non-dual, not all "conditions" > of non-duality are demonstrations of Enlightenment.
So, in your view, it's better to be an ego-bound schlub on an endless Buddhist treadmill to a future perfection that is rarely ever achieved than to live the freedom of a non-dual awakening that doesn't qualify as the highest, most bestest possible "Enlightenment"?
