--- In [email protected], Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > More seriously, the reason bliss is stupid is that it > an object of experience. When you experience bliss you > are in complete and total bondage to it. Bliss is just > an object of experience. Bliss is not liberation. > Bliss is not pure consciousness.
--------------------- I interpret this somewhat differently. When MMY says something like "The bliss of the state of enlightenment…" he seems to be suggesting an affective state. His version of enlightenment has, as a lived experience, something called bliss. Through his practice pure consciousness becomes Presence – its mediation becomes blissful. ----------------------
