--- In [email protected], "Richard J. Williams" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> tertonzeno wrote:
> > The Ramakrishna mantra I received from 
> > the resident teacher at the Vedanta Temple 
> > in Hollywood...
> >
> About a year after my TM initiation I was
> meditating at the Vedanta Temple in Hollywood
> with Franklin Jones and I heard my TM bija
> mantra being recited during the puja. That's
> when I realized that the TM bijas are pretty
> common - not just made up sounds by the 
> Marshy. But they were not being used the same
> way - I was using my bija to transcend, they
> were chanting in order to entertain.
> 
> > Sant Mat Mantras
> >
> Not sure about this. When I was involved in
> Sant Mat, there were no 'mantras' given out.
> Charan Singh just told me to concentrate on
> the 'Sound Current', Shabd, Naam.
> 
> > ...or attempted use of "Om Nama Shivaya" 
> > or "Om Shivaya Namah" silently, after 
> > getting involved with Muktananda.
> >
> From what I could tell, the Muktananda sadhaks
> didn't really have a clue about the transcending
> aspect of meditation. Again, a lot of chanting
> and talking about the transcending. There was
> no checking involved, so how would anyone
> know if they were transcending or not? 
> 
> > These Shiva mantras are quite powerful if 
> > chanted by a group; but didn't measure up to 
> > my TM mantra when used silently.
> >
> There's just no comparison to having a puja
> after a group meditation using TM - it is
> much more powerful after the transcending.
> 
> I've been present during many ISKCON pujas
> and many ISDL pujas for many years - no
> comparison. This also goes for the pujas held
> at Dharmadatu and S.F. Zen Center.
> 
> >  ...just picking a mantra out of a book
> > 
> A 'mantra' can only be given by a guru in an
> initiation, otherwise it's not really a mantra.
> A mantra is anything the guru says it is.
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > Nope, after a direct experience "taste test",
> > TM turned out to be superior to others, in 
> > regard to the criterion of Shakti. 
> > 
> Based on my experience, TM is the easiest, most
> effective, and best meditation technique on the
> entire planet. I don't have a vested interest
> in saying this since I'm not a TM teacher. 
> 
> Like Judy says, I'm just a rank-and-file TMer.
> But based on my experience of forty years, I 
> can now say without the least hesitation that 
> TM is just what intelligent people do!

Amen :-)

Reply via email to