--- In [email protected], ruthsimplicity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], ruthsimplicity no_reply@ > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I looked at John Mack a while back, I'll look again. He had > > > > > some other "odd" beliefs IIRC. > > > > > > > > Yes, he thought such experiences could be > > > > transformative if they were handled properly. > > > > > > He also believed in auras. > > > > Not clear what that means. Did he *see* auras? > > I am not clear on what he meant either. Maybe saw. Maybe > felt. Or otherwise maybe perceived or thought others > perceived.
Let me ask another way: What did he say about auras? > > > > If you have compelling evidence of alien > > > > > encounters beyond reported experience, let me know. > > > > > > > > Well, you know I don't have the kind of evidence > > > > you're asking for, so I'n not sure why you even > > > > mention it. > > > > > > To emphasize the lack of evidence. > > > > Then it would have been a bit more straightforward > > just to say so, don't you think? > > I already had said that there was no other evidence > and you did not acknowledge that fact. I never made any claim there was other evidence, either. I assumed lack of empirical evidence was a given for both of us. It never occurred to me to "acknowledge" your statement of a well-known fact. > This reply is just a dig. That's what I suspected. And a needless one. > > Now you can criticize how I present my comments, or we can talk about > the topic, which is in the case alien abductions.
