--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They're very plausible if you aren't familiar with > the nature of the reports and the reporting > circumstances. Once you have become familiar with > them, the explanations you propose have to be to read the reports. I have read in the past some of these reports and I am not blown away. Done with the topic and time to do some work. I can't believe I spent so many posts on this!
