--- In [email protected], ruthsimplicity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "sandiego108" <sandiego108@>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], ruthsimplicity <no_reply@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "sandiego108"
<sandiego108@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected], "geezerfreak"
> > <geezerfreak@>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > <snip> Again, you're missing the point and trying to divert
the
> > issue
> > > > which is that MMY praised a
> > > > > brutal dictator Mugabe, So, answer the question Off: Was
MMY
> > correct
> > > > in praising
> > > > > Mugabe?
> > > > >
> > > > In keeping with his overall strategy, I think he was
consistent
> > in
> > > > praising Mugabe-- hoping to succeed as he did rarely with
> > national
> > > > governments to get them to adopt TM within the government (I
> > think
> > > > this only worked with Costa Rica and...was it Mozambique?).
He
> > > > certainly wouldn't have gotten very far just outright
condemning
> > them,
> > > > so he tried flattery instead.
> > > >
> > >
> > > So the end justifies the means.
> > >
> > Only Maharishi can answer that. I am not defending what
Maharishi
> > did, just providing an explanation for what he did.
> >
>
> That's fine and I am not picking on you. But what do you think
> personally?
>
My answer may drive you nuts, but since it already happened, I am OK
with it. IME, it makes life unbearable to fight the past.
