--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@> > > wrote: > <snip> > > > I'm baaaaack! > > > > And you are welcome baaaaack, partly because > > even though you almost certainly went over the > > posting limit last week by accident, you took > > your timeout quietly, without fuss, and with > > class. > > > > Compare and contrast to some who, in the class > > department, have shown...uh...not so much. > > ROTFL! > > I've never made a fuss about a timeout. I was > never *given* a timeout to make a fuss about. > > Barry has also claimed that I "refused" to take > a timeout, even though (a) I've never been > given one, and (b) there's no "refusal" option > for timeouts. > > Barry lives a life of solipsistic fantasy > because reality doesn't work quite the way he > thinks it should. > > And, oh, if you want to see "class," check out > a few of Barry's posts ranting about my posting > habits, based on the obsessive count he keeps > of the number of my posts. > > Sick, and getting sicker by the day.
Gee, Judy...I was talking about Shemp and Nabby and sparaig, all of whom have thrown tantrums over being tossed off for a week or more. Did you somehow think I was talking about you? Must be a guilty conscience. And the lack of class thing, of course... :-) But now that you bring it up (I didn't) You *have* gone over the posting limit more than anyone here. That is documented, both before the enforced timeouts, and afterwards. And you have even *admitted* that you went over, and yet never once did you *voluntarily* take your well-deserved timeout. I'd say that speaks to a certain lack of class, wouldn't you?
