There is a difference between speaking about ego, I, Self etc. as if these were real objects that could be pointed to meaningfully in an abstract discussion, and speaking about one's "sense of self". A sense of self is an experience, not an idea. By all appearances, it is a very common experience, and the absence of it is not at all a common experience. Does this have anything to do with what is "real"?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "marekreavis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "The ego(self) is as real as the 'it' in 'It's raining.'" > -- paraphrase from something posted last year on FFL > No it at all. Just raining. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
