Interesting. All I did was *ask* whether folks thought it was Barry or Nabby who was lying, and that seems to have so seriously unnerved Barry that he felt it imperative to try to intimidate anyone who might be tempted to say it was Barry by labeling them a TB in advance.
--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Hugo" <richardhughes103@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: <snip> > > > Which of the two, Nabby or Barry, is lying, do you think? > > > > Barry wasn't lying he was speculating. > > No, no, no...you still haven't figured out how > it works, Richard. > > If an "anti-TMer" says anything speculative about > a TMer, it's a lie. Especially if the TMer has > claimed the opposite about themselves, because we > are to always trust everything that a TMer says > about themselves. TMers always tell the truth > and they never delude themselves. > > Whereas if a TB TMer says anything speculative > about an "anti-TMer," it is not only *not* a lie, > it is by definition The Truth. And anything these > "anti-TMers" say about themselves can be considered > just another lie because all they can possibly do > is lie. "Anti-TMers" always lie and the very fact > that they don't believe that TM is "the best" > *proves* that they're delusional. > > Are you straight on the rules now? :-) <snip>
