--- Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 6/19/05 1:09 PM, Sal Sunshine at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I don't know, Rick, I could be all wet on this, > but it sounds to me like > > you're almost suggesting putting someone in the > stocks, figuratively speaking. > > For once I agree with Sparaig, what goes on > between adults in a *consensual* > > matter should stay there. > > > But are all adults created equal? Bill and Monica? > Gurus in their mid-50¹s > and women in their early 20¹s? Is it OK for men in > positions of power and > authority to use that power and authority to have > relationships that would > not occur if they were ordinary guys? Especially if > those relationships > conflict with their publicly-stated lifestyle > (marriage Bill, or monkhood > MMY)? Is it OK if those relationships compromise > their ability to perform > their jobs, or is that their business? On this last > question, I¹m inclined > to say it¹s their business, but it¹s the right of > those who elected them or > follow them to react as they see fit. It's not so much the sexual behavior that is bothersome, but the implicit deception involved in presenting one's self as a celibate monk and then pursuing sex with course participants/staff behind closed doors. > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
