--- In [email protected], Peter Sutphen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > on 6/19/05 1:09 PM, Sal Sunshine at > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > I don't know, Rick, I could be all wet on this, > > but it sounds to me like > > > you're almost suggesting putting someone in the > > stocks, figuratively speaking. > > > For once I agree with Sparaig, what goes on > > between adults in a *consensual* > > > matter should stay there. > > > > > But are all adults created equal? Bill and Monica? > > Gurus in their mid-50¹s > > and women in their early 20¹s? Is it OK for men in > > positions of power and > > authority to use that power and authority to have > > relationships that would > > not occur if they were ordinary guys? Especially if > > those relationships > > conflict with their publicly-stated lifestyle > > (marriage Bill, or monkhood > > MMY)? Is it OK if those relationships compromise > > their ability to perform > > their jobs, or is that their business? On this last > > question, I¹m inclined > > to say it¹s their business, but it¹s the right of > > those who elected them or > > follow them to react as they see fit. > > It's not so much the sexual behavior that is > bothersome, but the implicit deception involved in > presenting one's self as a celibate monk and then > pursuing sex with course participants/staff behind > closed doors. > >
Of course, but why did the World Press give Maharishi such immunity? Aside from a report from the Beatles era, what press rumors of this surfaced in the last 50 years? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
