More about the "elitism" accusation, since
there still appears to be significant
misunderstanding of what those who level the
accusation mean by it:


--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Speaking as someone who grew up in a military
> family, I can support Lawson's statement about
> McCain's upbringing as the progeny of Admirals.
> There is little on planet Earth more elitist
> and with clearer demarcation lines between the
> elite and the non-elite than officer and enlist-
> ed man, and the children of officers and the
> children of enlisted men. Basically, there was
> such a strong and tangible boundary line that
> the kids of officers rarely even talked to the
> kids of enlisted men.

Of course, the notion that I ever contested
this is entirely Barry's fantasy (also Lawson's).
I have no doubt it's true and never claimed
otherwise.

My point was that elitism *within* the
military has nothing to do with the "elitist"
charge against Obama, or whether McCain is
*more* elitist. Apples and loquats.

Which should really be obvious: the
military is the *last* group of people who
would be considered elitist by those making
the charge, i.e., the Republicans, since the
military itself--especially the higher
echelons--is heavily Republican (although
that is now beginning to change).

Instead, the elitism charge is leveled
against Democrats, who are portrayed by 
Republicans as unsupportive and even scornful
of the military.

And it's actually *true* that many Democrats
look down their noses at the military as a
less-worthy occupation, even as they noisily
claim to be "supporting the troops."

John Kerry got into terrible trouble during 
his presidential campaign for a botched joke
in which he appeared to suggest that only
stupid people joined the military:

"You know, education, if you make the most of
it, if you study hard and you do your homework,
and you make an effort to be smart, you can do
well. If you don't, you get stuck in Iraq."

He had actually intended this to be a swipe at
Bush for getting the military stuck in Iraq,
not the military itself, as his prepared text
documented, but he fouled it up in the delivery.

In any case, it disastrously reinforced the
picture the Republicans had been working so
hard to paint of Kerry as an elitist.

So the whole premise that McCain is more of an
elitist than Obama because McCain belonged to
the *military* elite is nonsense.

One more time: the "elitist" charge leveled by
Republicans against Democrats, including Obama,
has to do with *attitude*, with looking down on
groups of people, particularly the working
class (in Obama's case) and the military. In
terms of background, as opposed to current
attitudes, the most important indicator of
elitism is education. Attending an "elite"
military institute such as Annapolis doesn't
qualify as an "elite" educational background
in this context; attending Harvard or Yale or
any Ivy League school does.

Whether Obama *is* an elitist in this sense is
a different issue. Whether elitism in this
sense is a silly charge or has some merit is
a different issue.

But if either of these are going to be
discussed, we first have to understand what
those who level the charge mean by it,
otherwise we're tilting at straw men.

Finally, going back to what started the
discussion between Lawson and me, Obama's
claim that he couldn't be an elitist because
he was raised by a single mother on food
stamps (even if the food stamps part was true)
is also a straw-man argument. Growing up in
straitened circumstances doesn't counter the
charge, especially if one overcame those
circumstances to attend an Ivy League school
and become one of the occupational and
intellectual elite. And growing up amid 
great wealth, or marrying into it, likewise
does not in and of itself make one an
elitist.

What makes one an elitist, essentially, is
whether one perceives oneself to be more
worthy than the great unwashed. Obviously
that a person perceives him/herself to be 
more worthy is itself a perception, which
may or may not be accurate. But Obama is
widely perceived to hold this attitude, and
McCain is not. That's the bottom line here.


Reply via email to