Barry, you might as well shut up about politics and stick to something you know about. Horror flicks? Anyway, you're probably a friggn' Log Cabin Republican. For the record, I have been a dedicated Democrat my entire life and over the years, I have in fact helped the party with fund raising, door knocking, lit dropping, etc. Besides carping about whoever happens to be lodging a bug up you ass, what have you ever done for anyone?
> > > serving on committees, volunteering, rallying and fighting > > > for down-ticket Dems. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "mainstream20016" > <mainstream20016@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> wrote: > > > > > > "Obama defames the tradition of FDR Democrats, who are the > > > life-long party stalwarts devoting their lives to state and > > > local politics; fund raising, door knocking, lit dropping, > > > serving on committees, volunteering, rallying and fighting > > > for down-ticket Dems. For the first time in my life, I have > > > no enthusiasm for any of this. > > > > Why not ? Did Hillary's defeat defeat you ? Apparently not, > > based on the number of, and degree of energy poured into, > > the FFL posts you direct against Barack Obama. Every stroke > > of your keyboard confirms the worst stereotypes about sore losers. > > Not to mention poseurs who lie to themselves and > others. My bet is that Raunchydog has never done > ANY of the things in the top paragraph above. My > bet is that she's never done ANYTHING to support > the Democratic Party in the past. She's just > glommed onto that image to avoid admitting to us, > and to herself, that the ONLY reason she's doing > all this is that she's a sore loser still pissed > off because she backed a more graceful loser. > > Hillary -- to her credit -- could move on. Raunch > and Judy can't. They like to posture as if they're > doing what they do -- spending hours dredging up > and posting smear articles about Obama -- out of > some noble sense of "fighting for the principles > of the Democratic Party." > > But literally everyone here knows that's a lie. > Neither of them gives a shit about the Democratic > Party. They SAY that they do because that seems > sexier and more noble than admitting the truth, > that they're just angry, dried-up old women who > can no longer get off on anything *but* anger. > > They like to "prettify" the anger by pretending > that there is something noble about it, but there > isn't. They're just trying to destroy Obama because > they're bored, and so unintelligent that the only > thing they can think of to alleviate their boredom > is to try to destroy something. > > Think I'm wrong? > > Ok, I'm calling for a show of hands. Is there > ANYONE on this forum who believes that the reason > that they're doing this is for any reason other > than to spite Obama for pointing out that they > had backed a loser, a loser that they had devel- > oped an unhealthy crush on? > > Step up to the plate, ANYONE who feels that these > women are being honest about their motives. ANYONE. > > We'll wait... >
