|
You raise some good questions. If you wish to then read
in, otherwise just consider this another waste of my time.
----- Original Message -----
From: claudiouk
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 3:30 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Relative My question though is, if in enlightenment the Knower is
the "infinite" Self, no longer the "point" ego, which effectively gets overridden (apart from its organizing functions), then you are left with a Self and a perceiving body. There might well be an experience of "Self in all beings/ all beings in Self" but how true can that be if it remains exclusively linked to the original "point" body and its perceptions? -----This is the problem, identifying with the body
as if it's a point. The body is infinite. The self is absolute, not infinite. A
point of identification is the absolute identifying with some snapshot of the
infinite. There are no points. There are merely snapshots. As soon as the camera
eye of the absolute has finished with its picture the scene has changed. How
mant times does your pet, or baby do something cute, and you yell for the wife,
and then she comes running, and the pet, or baby won't do it again?
Snapshot, snapshot, snapshot, snapshot.
And then we get hung up on the better pitcures of
yesterday when our hair blew just right, and Kali didn't appear so lustful in
our own eyes. All beings are linked, even in the snapshot. Didn't you see the
dolphin in the ocean behind the subject, and the water sprites in the cloud
dipping their heads into the underside of the gray foam of their world. What
about the baby which raised it's hand too the twinkling sunlight refracted of
your lens.
As such it's just like a glorified relative
ego blessed with blissful oceanic feelings. -----Except that unlike the horny housewife who is
identifying with her wet snatch (who as been having a midlife crises
for the last ten years), and the postman-as-divinely-handy-tool, (Thank you
Jesus), except that, the enlightened aren't really identifying with their
vagina, wet or dry, no, they are a circumference without any point for fastening
upon. And so also, when the postman turnes them down, or they are to shy to
invite him in, they release the horns, and don't treat their husbands like shit
when they get home. Or they refasten the horns and work their man over, to his
surprise. You see the enlightened is not afraid to try something new, since they
aren't just a snapshot. Snapshot. The enlightened wife has a lucky husband who
comes home to the field of all possibilities.
It would only be a true
cosmic Self if, moving from infinity to "point", it no longer is exclusively linked to the original "point" body, ----The problem is using TM-speak which is
relative, and based not upon the Sanskrit basis for the philosophy but is based
in the English or other language and is the interpretation of an interpretation.
In Tibetan they have five words for thought, five for mind, and so
on....
The body is an amazing thing. Really amazing. Think
how flexible and beautiful it is. And what is it? It's billions of individual
cells. When you are speaking of a point body, what's your point? Which point?
And even in that point are more points. Iin the cell is an atom of particles,
and smaller points beyond. What one finds is the self same field of the
absolute, and no points, no motion, nothing being created, or dying. Nothing but
an absolute. That's is. Snap. Snap.
since Self is
omnipresent, at every point. That would make it less "relative" than before, since it would now be linked with an infinity of "points" of perception. You mention omniscience.. well if there is only ONE Knower anyway... presumably in Unity this happens? Otherwise again it would be a "point" hallucinating "infinity", with no "reality" to it. Snapshot.
----A better question is why am I happy sometimes but not at others? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links
|
- [FairfieldLife] Re: The Relative Irmeli Mattsson
- [FairfieldLife] Re: The Relative jim_flanegin
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Relative Vaj
- [FairfieldLife] Re: The Relative jim_flanegin
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Relative Llundrub
