You haven't been paying attention. We raised the post limit to 75 for two weeks because of the election, but now it's back to 50.
I've been thinking about Vaj's suggestion of averaging out posts over two weeks, so that if you don't post much one week, you could post more the next. There are problems with that, such as deciding which two weeks go together. IOW, if you do 25 one week and 75 the next, who's to say that those two weeks go together? Maybe the 25 week was preceded by a 75 week and the 2nd 75 week would have to be followed by a 25 week, not a fresh start on averaging 2 weeks. But a plan I think would be cool if Bhairitu or someone could automate it, would be to give people 50 posts a week starting from the day they sign up, (existing members would get 50 per week starting from the day we inaugurate the plan), and then hold them to an average of 50 per week henceforth. They could only exceed 50 per week if they had accumulated a post deficit. For instance, if they average 25 per week for the first three weeks, they would be allowed 125 posts the 4th week. I doubt that most people would abuse this system and go crazy some week. But it would restrict to those who tend to max out to their usual limit, while enabling those who rarely reach the posting limit to relax and forget about it. It would easy to calculate this if the weekly totals were added to a spreadsheet, but I wouldn't know how to automate that. Maybe one of our computer whizzes could figure it out. From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard J. Williams Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 7:02 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count Well, I guess we won't be hearing from these guys for at least a week! LOL! > 75 shempmcgurk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 75 authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 75 Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 74 TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:no_reply%40yahoogroups.com> > > 54 Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
