Too complicated! Fifty a week seems about right. It's easy to
remember, easy to calculate. 

--- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You haven't been paying attention. We raised the post limit to 75
for two
> weeks because of the election, but now it's back to 50.
> 
>  
> 
> I've been thinking about Vaj's suggestion of averaging out posts
over two
> weeks, so that if you don't post much one week, you could post more the
> next. There are problems with that, such as deciding which two weeks go
> together. IOW, if you do 25 one week and 75 the next, who's to say that
> those two weeks go together? Maybe the 25 week was preceded by a 75
week and
> the 2nd 75 week would have to be followed by a 25 week, not a fresh
start on
> averaging 2 weeks. But a plan I think would be cool if Bhairitu or
someone
> could automate it, would be to give people 50 posts a week starting
from the
> day they sign up, (existing members would get 50 per week starting
from the
> day we inaugurate the plan), and then hold them to an average of 50
per week
> henceforth. They could only exceed 50 per week if they had accumulated a
> post deficit. For instance, if they average 25 per week for the
first three
> weeks, they would be allowed 125 posts the 4th week. I doubt that most
> people would abuse this system and go crazy some week. But it would
restrict
> to those who tend to max out to their usual limit, while enabling
those who
> rarely reach the posting limit to relax and forget about it.
> 
>  
> 
> It would easy to calculate this if the weekly totals were added to a
> spreadsheet, but I wouldn't know how to automate that. Maybe one of our
> computer whizzes could figure it out.
> 
>  
> 
> From: [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Richard J. Williams
> Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 7:02 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count
> 
>  
> 
> Well, I guess we won't be hearing from these
> guys for at least a week! LOL!
> 
> > 75 shempmcgurk <shempmcgurk@>
> > 75 authfriend <jstein@>
> > 75 Robert <babajii_99@>
> > 74 TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:no_reply%40yahoogroups.com> >
> > 54 Rick Archer <rick@>
>


Reply via email to