Well, for what it is worth from an outsider he comes accross to the world as the best guy to have the job in living memory - good luck to him; and the world is astionshed, and plased, that a black guy got the job - well done you. He comes accross good enough, well good enough. I would have him here in the UK any day.
Merlin. --- In [email protected], enlightened_dawn11 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > it is not his running of things, or not, that is so interesting. it > is his representation as leader of our country that is such a good > thing. so much is conveyed just by a leader's character. i am not > looking for anything in particular from him- just happy that our > country is represented now by someone who appears to be bright, > normal and well balanced, in distinct contrast to the current gang. > > --- In [email protected], "Dick Richardson" > somerset_2@ wrote: > > > > > > Have you guys got some kind of fixation with Obama? He is only > one man > > amomng the six billion plus here, and you guys ellected him after > all - > > and good luck to the young man, and his family; I hope he lives > long and > > does some good work - but you surely know that it is not > politicians > > that run this world - you cannot be that much into cloud cuckoo > land > > surely. > > > > Merlin. > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Richard J. Williams" > > <willytex@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Whatever happened to the posting-restrictions ? > > > > > > > > Jim wrote: > > > > I think Rick said, that for the two weeks around > > > > the election, that the posting limit was raised > > > > to 75 per week...But, that now, it would be back > > > > to the regular 50 per week. Correct me, if I'm > > > > wrong... > > > > > > > Did we vote on this? Why would the posting limit be > > > upped just because of Obama - maybe so more leftist > > > political propaganda could be posted? From what I've > > > read, Obama is a progressive. Some informants just > > > went ape-shit posting sexist comments about Gov. > > > Palin - that's about it. The independent parties got > > > screwed over, again. > > > > > >
