--- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Some talking head (I forget which) recently pointed
> out that the time Hillary is taking to accept or
> turn down the offer for secretary of state  is a bit
> passive aggressive.  

I think you mean "some talking head recently
*suggested*." You can only "point out" a fact.
This is just a supposition.

> I don't know if that is true or not since we don't
> have the details of the supposed "offer" or have full
> disclosure on how complicated Bill's foreign country
> business deals would make this.
>
> Maybe it's a slight, maybe not.

Maybe it's a matter of genuine conflict on
Hillary's part. There's no question that it's
a tough decision; there are very major pros
and cons for her.

> But it does show very good faith on Obama's side
> towards Hillary that he is letting this impression
> of a diss linger.

What, the impression of some talking head??

I haven't heard this particular impression
anywhere else. I suspect it's unique to this
specific talking head. But there are plenty of
'em out there still who are unable to see
anything Hillary does or says in a positive
light. If she'd jumped on it right away, they'd
be criticizing her for that.

  He gave her great
> respect and consideration to let this offer get out
> and let her take her own sweet time in answering.

He obviously badly wants to have her as SoS,
or he wouldn't have leaked it in the first
place.

> I wonder if the Hillaryphiles here are going to
> acknowledge that she is getting very preferential
> treatment here.

If so, it's "preferential treatment" toward the
candidate he'd prefer to have. There's no hurry
about the appointment; Obama's ahead of the game
with regard to his cabinet choices.

  If it was me, (and thank
> all the gods it is not!) I would say, "here is the
> offer, take the weekend to decide, on Monday you
> either sign up or I move one to my next choice.

Thank the gods indeed that it's not you. Thank the
gods Obama has the good judgment to realize how
crucial it is that she think the prospect through
and make sure it's what she wants to do.

He doesn't want her either to accept too hastily
and then regret accepting the job later; or to
turn it down because he hasn't given her time to
consider all the ins and outs.

Neither Obama nor Hillary, nor Bill, give a flying
freak about all the drama that the press and their
supporters are trying to gin up. They want to do
this the right way, whether she ends up with the
gig or not. Obama isn't worried about whether
some talking head thinks he's been dissed, or even
whether some of his low-level people think that.

It would be pretty small of him to insist she take it
or leave it immediately just so he wouldn't appear to
be letting her diss him, if he really thinks having
her as SoS would be best for the country. But if that
isn't what he thinks, then it would seem as though
he's jerking *her* around.

Why don't we just wait and see what happens instead
of busily imputing ill motives we have no idea are
real? The latest word is he'll make the announcement
right after Thanksgiving.


Reply via email to