--- In [email protected], "Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], enlightened_dawn11 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Barry is so sunk in fantasy, so convinced that > > > he won't be held accountable for what he says, > > > that he feels perfectly free to lie about what's > > > in an article in the *New York Times*: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > An article in HuffPost today (originally from > > > > the New York Times) says that all of the talk > > > > about Hillary being offered the position of > > > > SoS in the first place was leaked to the press > > > > by the *Clinton* people, not from the Obama > > > > camp. The latter are quite distraught about > > > > the leaks. > > > > > > > > http://tinyurl.com/5cd3c6 > > > > > -snip- > > > > i saw the same thing on cnn and msnbc - the supposed > > source of the SoS leak was a common story on the news, > > nothing confined to just the huffington post. just one > > of those things that comes and goes. who cares if its > > true or not? i personally think hc would make one > > hell of a good sec o' state. > > You are on the right track ed11. > > Hillary's people carefully leaked it.
Wow. Now Tom's lying too. Somebody explain it to me: Why do we tolerate liars on this forum, again?
