--- In [email protected], Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Vaj wrote:
> >
> > I recently was invited to attend a weekend basic training in 
> > meditation with a close, life-long friend in the Shambhala tradition. 
> > It was probably the most impressive basic meditation instruction I've 
> > ever witnessed as the teacher was a 30+ year veteran who spoke from 
> > his own considerable experience. They operate under the basic 
> > assumption that intro meditation is the most difficult to teach so the 
> > Shambhala people only authorize their most advanced teachers for the 
> > first level. For a weekend starting with an open friday night lecture 
> > with breakfast Saturday and Sunday, lunch on Saturday, afternoon tea 
> > and a reception gourmet feast on graduation Sunday the course was only 
> > 100 dollars.
> >
> > Most interesting was seeing the unity experiences people began having 
> > right away, in that short weekend; young college students, college 
> > professors, old folks, a blind lady with her guide dog. Lots of time 
> > to interview privately with the teacher(s) and small group discussions 
> > as well as along with the whole group.
> My tantric guru did not allow me to teach meditation until I had been 
> with him for 5 years.   Imagine if MMY had done that.  And the basis for 
> "checking" is pretty much the same throughout most techniques: don't 
> strain on the mantra.  But look at the discussions in the past here that 
> the concepts in checking were unique to TM which is not true at all.   
> I've also mentioned that the "seven steps" are a little archaic.  That 
> may have worked in the 60's and 70's but nowadays most meditation 
> courses are taught in the weekend course like you describe or one on 
> one.  With both (particularly the latter) there is plenty of time for 
> interaction between teacher and student.  For groups, the weekend 
> courses seem to fit better in modern schedules.
>

AFter all this time, you stil think that the essence of TM is "don't strain
on the mantra?"


Sheesh. 


Lawson



Reply via email to