--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In a message dated 6/24/05 12:37:33 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Of course, that is not what the SC ruled. It upheld 100 years of > precedent where eminent domain is used for "public purpose" -- in this > case a redevelopment project to revitalize the econonomy of the town > /area. > > > > > Bingo! and raise taxes on more developed property!
That's the justification. However, the conservative judges were mostly against it. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
