--- In [email protected], "dhamiltony2k5" 
<dhamiltony...@...> wrote:
>
> Michael Langone, in his article "Cults, Violence, and the 
> Millennium," suggests the following three characteristics as 
> essential in 
> 
> the definition of a cultic group:
> 1.    centralized control by a charismatic leader 



Yes, that certainly WAS the case under MMY.

I can't say that's the case now.  Neither Hagelin, da King, nor Bevan 
have much charisma whatsoever.




> 2.    an us vs. them mentality that isolates 




Somewhat as far as the TMO is concerned.

Not at all as far as regular meditators are concerned.




> 3.    a lack of tolerance for dissent 




Well, you can dissent but you just won't get on courses.






> 
> 
> >
> > LNI  cult-test:
> > 
> > Identifying Traits of Abusive Groups
> > 
> > Control-oriented leadership – leader claims to be an all-knowing, 
> > liberated being.
> > 
> > Hierarchical structure with an elite inner circle – including 
> > leader's assistants.
> > 
> > Group leader not accountable to any authorities, as are, for 
> example: 
> > military commanders, ministers, priests, monks, and rabbis of 
> > mainstream denominations.
> > 
> > Polarized us vs. them or black and white mentality causing 
conflict 
> > with wider society.
> > 
> > Manipulation of members by alternating 
guilt/anxiety/fear/ostracism 
> > and attention.
> > 
> > Group perception of being spiritually unique/elite and separate 
> from 
> > normal culture.
> > 
> > Denunciation of other spiritual/religious leaders and groups.
> > 
> > Mind-numbing techniques (such as meditation, chanting, speaking 
in 
> > tongues, denunciation sessions, and debilitating work routines) 
are 
> > used to suppress doubts about group and leader.
> > 
> > Spiritual practices emphasize experience rather than rationality.
> > 
> > Sexual abuse - leader uses power to sexually exploit members.
> > 
> > Economic exploitation of members by leader and assistants.
> > 
> > Confidentiality of members private affairs (legal, medical) 
> violated 
> > by leader and assistants.
> > 
> > Members' subservience to group causes them to cut or weaken ties 
> with 
> > family, friends, and personal goals and activities that were of 
> > interest before joining group.
> > 
> > Reliance on outside professional help, doctors, therapists, etc., 
> > discouraged.
> > 
> > Leader poses as self-sacrificing divine agent who only promotes 
> > members' well-being.
> > 
> > Service is inner directed toward the group not the surrounding 
> > community.
> > 
> > Revamping of members' cultural/moral values to suit leader's 
> > lifestyle and program.
> > 
> > Conformity to group's/leader's values, life style, mode of dress, 
> > diet, esthetics, and so on.
> > 
> > Promotion of dependence on group/leader – often disguised.
> > Important personal decisions must be approved by leader – members 
> > seek his blessing.
> > 
> > Phobia induction vis-à-vis leaving the group/leader.
> > 
> > Painful exit process – ex-members ridiculed, threatened, and 
dumped.
> > 
> > LNI Note: If you check any of these items as characteristics of 
the 
> > group you are concerned about, and particularly if you check many 
> of 
> > them, you should reexamine the group and your relationship to it. 
> > Such reexamination usually runs against the dictates of the group 
> > leaders and will be difficult for the member to do. Begin by 
> speaking 
> > to outside health and legal professionals and ex-members. If your 
> > group is indeed healthy and non-abusive, there is nothing to fear 
> > from taking these cautionary steps.
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > > Rick posted "Features of Healthy and Unhealthy Religious Cults" 
> just
> > > one week after founding this group (FFL). Check out message 11:
> > > 
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/11
> > > 
> > > A few highlights:
> > > 
> > > "No expensive entry fees or initiations."
> > > 
> > > "No obsessive scheduling, such that every moment of one's waking
> > > life is controlled by the group."
> > > 
> > > "No flat affect (zombie-like absence of emotions). No 
excessively
> > > auto--matic, robot-like behavior."
> > > 
> > > "No crusading agenda to "save the world" or "convert all
> > > souls to the true way." Rather, an emphasis on becoming
> > > individually
> > > transformed so that one is better aligned with the God-Self and
> > > involved in a simple, non-grandiose form of service to one's
> > > fellow beings."
> > > 
> > > "No turning cult members into watched objects who have no 
privacy 
> in
> > > their solitary behavior or relationships with others. No
> > > manipulative system of rewards and punishments. No totalitarian
> > > structure of per-mission and non-permission regarding basic
> > > behaviors including personal hygiene, interpersonal 
communication,
> > > etc. No Orwellian system of in--formers who convey information 
to
> > > leaders about persons behind their back. No Machiavellian 
> techniques
> > > of setting members against each other or against outsiders. No
> > > ganging up on individual members to criticize or humiliate or 
> coerce
> > > them; no "working on them" to violate their own sense of
> > > conscience or autonomy. No brainwashing or mind-control."
> > > 
> > > "No suppression of dissent, doubt, critical thinking, sincere
> > > questions, discussion or independent judgment. No regarding of
> > > leader's or sacred text's teachings as infallible. No
> > > attachment to doctrinal certainty."
> > > 
> > > Just some highlights, there's plenty more.
> > >
> > 
> > om
> >
>


Reply via email to