--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, > "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> wrote: > > > > Barry moved the goal posts. He has a new > > requirement following up his complaint that > > women who talk the talk rather than walk the > > talk are not "real" feminists. Not only must > > "real" feminists prove they have DONE > > something in life but provide evidence they > > have selflessly helped OTHERS. > > Raunchy, your life will be happier if you ignore > Turq. He teases and trolls you. He has > admitted as much.
Is Ruth suggesting Barry didn't mean what he said in this little go-round? Is she saying he doesn't really make the distinction he described between "real" and "false" feminists? Because he seemed to want to be taken *very* seriously on that point. He even made it quite clear to Curtis that he wasn't kidding around when Curtis suggested he was.
