--- In [email protected], Peter Sutphen [...] > There's some good research in TM and some really > crappy research in TM. Most of the crappy research > comes about because pilot studies are being done with > marginal research designs because the researcher is > looking for some effect before dedicating lots of time > and money into better designed research. But then the > TMO gets ahold of this and uses it as if it is some > sort of well designed research and it is far from > that.
This is true. However, the MUM researchers don't approach non-TM researchers to conduct join-research funded by the NIH until they're pretty confident that they WILL find pro-TM results. This is one reason why much of the best-designed studies on TM (at least out of MUM) are quite positive: they cherry pick what they're going to study and only study what they are *certain* will show TM in a good light. Again, the recent North vs. South entrance stuff > is crappy research. More than likely, though it should be possible to conduct surveys that aren't biased. BTW, does anyone know the answer to this? Does the Sthapatya-Veda orientation of North-South entrances change once you cross the Equator? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
