--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 27, 2005, at 11:30 AM, Rory Goff wrote: > > > Yes, I guess this is where we differ -- I honestly don't think > > any "path" is going to take us anywhere other than here, and so I > > don't think Buddhahood can be "achieved" at all. Rather, "we" do > > what "we" do until "we" don't, if you see what I mean. > > And why would you choose to believe that this is not a path?
I am not saying this didn't feel like a path at the time -- only that after the fact, one sees it that led exactly nowhere. Hence I don't really get the whole discussion of which path is better (or gets us "enlightened" or "leads us to Buddhahood" or whatever), or which view is better, and so on. To me they all look like exactly the same path and the same view -- a view involving denial of here- now in favor of something conceptualized and projected not-here-now; e.g. something "better," "later." Am I missing something here? If so, I appreciate your patience in attempting to explain it to me. It must be a pretty huge blindspot, because I am definitely not getting it. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
