--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Jun 27, 2005, at 11:30 AM, Rory Goff wrote: > > > > > Yes, I guess this is where we differ -- I honestly don't think > > > any "path" is going to take us anywhere other than here, and so I > > > don't think Buddhahood can be "achieved" at all. Rather, "we" do > > > what "we" do until "we" don't, if you see what I mean. > > > > And why would you choose to believe that this is not a path? > > I am not saying this didn't feel like a path at the time -- only > that after the fact, one sees it that led exactly nowhere. Hence I > don't really get the whole discussion of which path is better (or > gets us "enlightened" or "leads us to Buddhahood" or whatever), or > which view is better, and so on. To me they all look like exactly > the same path and the same view -- a view involving denial of here- > now in favor of something conceptualized and projected not-here-now; > e.g. something "better," "later."
> Am I missing something here? If > so, I appreciate your patience in attempting to explain it to me. It > must be a pretty huge blindspot, because I am definitely not getting > it. So you are seeking a better "later" by resolving your blindspot? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
