--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "geezerfreak" <geezerfr...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > > > > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] > > On Behalf Of Joe Smith > > Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 9:33 PM > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi ??? > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , "ysoy10li" <ysoy10li@> wrote: > > > > > > ---Any new books on Maharishi in the last year ?? > > > I had read here maybe a few years ago that the infamous Judy > > (no, not Stein...) had > > > mentioned she wouldn't publish her book about her alleged > > experiences with M. until after > > > his passing... > > > > > She changed her mind and recanted the whole story saying it was just a > > hoax propagated by unhappy people in the movement. > > > > Are you saying this with any evidence or authority "Joe", or is this just > > the way you wish it were? > > > My thoughts exactly. When did she recant her story? Please give exact quotes and > references. > oh i see, since there is nothing but hearsay regarding the possibility of Maharishi's sexual escapades, you are more comfortable believing the "he fucked around" rumors, instead of believing the "he didn't fuck around" rumors?
did i get that right? gotta wonder about the bias, don't you-- or does that just not matter, trumped by character assassination?
