--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <r...@...> wrote: > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] > On Behalf Of TurquoiseB > Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 4:49 AM > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: new books on Maharishi ??? > > > > The TBs don't believe the rumors because it would > be "impossible" for them to be true. Sorta along > the lines of, "If an enlightened being (and we > assume as a given that MMY was one) tells us that > he's a celibate monk, well the words of the enlight- > ened are always true (and we know this because MMY > told us so), then him fucking around is *impossible*." > > Kinda like the Bible saying "every word in this book is true and you'd > better not change anything."
Rick, you never can resist taking a hit from that jar. Like Newdawn said, let's just have a little higher standard of proof. But no, it's gotta be, "these true belivers are so duped, they just refuse, refuse I say, under any circumstances they refuse that M fucked around. Their insistence of a higher burden of proof has got to be plain outright denial on their part.
